2004 Suzuki XL7 vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Suzuki XL7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Suzuki XL7 (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2012 Ford C-Max. (150 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki XL7 should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 295 kg more than 2012 Ford C-Max. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Suzuki XL7 (250 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford C-Max. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Suzuki XL7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford C-Max.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Suzuki XL7 | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Suzuki | Ford |
Model | XL7 | C-Max |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2736 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 240 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1626 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2648 mm |