2004 Suzuki XL7 vs. 2013 Ford EDGE
To start off, 2013 Ford EDGE is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford EDGE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford EDGE (281 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (185 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford EDGE should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki XL7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford EDGE weights approximately 215 kg more than 2004 Suzuki XL7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford EDGE (343 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 2013 Ford EDGE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Suzuki XL7 | 2013 Ford EDGE | |
Make | Suzuki | Ford |
Model | XL7 | EDGE |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2737 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 343 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 1840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4679 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2223 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 11.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 68 L |