2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1946 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1946 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 290 kg more than 1946 Volvo PV 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota 4Runner | 1946 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | 4Runner | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1946 |
| Engine Size | 3950 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2850 mm |
