2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 1964 Volvo 120
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 120. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 910 kg more than 1964 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 120. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota 4Runner | 1964 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | 4Runner | 120 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3950 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 382 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.7:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 45 L |
