2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1099 kg more than 1968 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (383 Nm) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota 4Runner | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Toyota | ZAZ |
| Model | 4Runner | 966 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3950 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 383 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 54.5 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1839 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2170 mm |
