2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (242 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1978 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Volvo 66. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota 4Runner | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | 4Runner | 66 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3995 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1390 mm |
