2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 1982 Volvo 360
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 360 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 360. (101 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 850 kg more than 1982 Volvo 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 360. (163 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 360.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Toyota 4Runner | 1982 Volvo 360 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | 4Runner | 360 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 163 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 58 L |