2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 1998 Volvo C70
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1998 Volvo C70. (190 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1998 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 495 kg more than 1998 Volvo C70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Volvo C70. (270 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Toyota 4Runner | 1998 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | 4Runner | C70 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 270 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 68 L |