2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2004 Volvo S60
To start off, both 2004 Toyota 4Runner and 2004 Volvo S60 were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2004 Volvo S60. (161 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 297 kg more than 2004 Volvo S60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (383 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volvo S60. (330 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volvo S60.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Toyota 4Runner | 2004 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | 4Runner | S60 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 383 Nm | 330 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 93.2 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1839 kg | 1542 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 70 L |