2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2010 Bentley Azure
To start off, 2010 Bentley Azure is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 6,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Bentley Azure is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Bentley Azure (500 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 255 more horse power than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Bentley Azure should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Bentley Azure weights approximately 856 kg more than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Bentley Azure (1,000 Nm) has 617 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (383 Nm). This means 2010 Bentley Azure will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Toyota 4Runner | 2010 Bentley Azure | |
Make | Toyota | Bentley |
Model | 4Runner | Azure |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 6800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 500 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 383 Nm | 1000 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1839 kg | 2695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1491 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3117 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 26.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 96 L |