2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 4,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-150. (171 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 398 kg more than 2010 Ford E-150. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-150. (232 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota 4Runner | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | Toyota | Ford |
| Model | 4Runner | E-150 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3950 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 171 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 382 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 1522 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1725 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 62 L |
