2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2010 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2010 Nissan Micra is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Micra. (87 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Micra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 522 kg more than 2010 Nissan Micra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Nissan Micra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan Micra. (128 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota 4Runner | 2010 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Toyota | Nissan |
| Model | 4Runner | Micra |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3950 cc | 1386 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 87 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 382 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 82.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.9:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1964 kg | 1442 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 46 L |
