2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (97 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 199 kg more than 2010 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (383 Nm) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (127 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Toyota 4Runner | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Toyota | Renault |
Model | 4Runner | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 383 Nm | 127 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1839 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 55 L |