2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2010 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2010 Volkswagen Polo. (178 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2010 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 651 kg more than 2010 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volkswagen Polo. (250 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Toyota 4Runner | 2010 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Toyota | Volkswagen |
Model | 4Runner | Polo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 178 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 250 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 1269 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1682 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1462 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 5.9 L/100km |