2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2011 Audi R8
To start off, 2011 Audi R8 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 5,200 cc (10 cylinders), 2011 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi R8 (525 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota 4Runner.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi R8 (530 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (382 Nm). This means 2011 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Toyota 4Runner | 2011 Audi R8 | |
Make | Toyota | Audi |
Model | 4Runner | R8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 525 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 530 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1245 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 19.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 90 L |