2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2011 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2011 Nissan Pixo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP) has 177 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2004 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Toyota 4Runner | 2011 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Toyota | Nissan |
Model | 4Runner | Pixo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 68 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2360 mm |