2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2012 BMW 116
To start off, 2012 BMW 116 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2012 BMW 116. (136 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2012 BMW 116. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 535 kg more than 2012 BMW 116. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 BMW 116. (220 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 BMW 116.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Toyota 4Runner | 2012 BMW 116 | |
Make | Toyota | BMW |
Model | 4Runner | 116 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 220 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4324 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1421 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 4.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 51 L |