2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2012 Chevrolet Cruze
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Cruze. (161 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Cruze.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Cruze. (360 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota 4Runner | 2012 Chevrolet Cruze | |
| Make | Toyota | Chevrolet |
| Model | 4Runner | Cruze |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3950 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 382 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 16.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1476 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2685 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 59 L |
