2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2012 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2012 Holden Caprice is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 99 more horse power than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (245 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota 4Runner.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (383 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota 4Runner | 2012 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Toyota | Holden |
| Model | 4Runner | Caprice |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3950 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 383 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 12.3 L/100km |
