2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 112 more horse power than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (245 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota 4Runner.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (382 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota 4Runner | 2012 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Toyota | Holden |
| Model | 4Runner | UTE |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3950 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 382 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
