2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2012 Opel Combo
To start off, 2012 Opel Combo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 2012 Opel Combo. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2012 Opel Combo.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Opel Combo. (126 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Toyota 4Runner | 2012 Opel Combo | |
Make | Toyota | Opel |
Model | 4Runner | Combo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 126 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 52 L |