2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2013 Honda Odyssey
To start off, 2013 Honda Odyssey is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 245 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda Odyssey weights approximately 150 kg more than 2004 Toyota 4Runner.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda Odyssey. (339 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda Odyssey.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota 4Runner | 2013 Honda Odyssey | |
| Make | Toyota | Honda |
| Model | 4Runner | Odyssey |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3950 cc | 3471 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 382 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 2070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5152 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2011 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1737 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3000 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 80 L |
