2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2013 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2013 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Pathfinder (256 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 71 kg more than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Nissan Pathfinder. (325 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Nissan Pathfinder.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Toyota 4Runner | 2013 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Toyota | Nissan |
Model | 4Runner | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 325 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 1991 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5009 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1961 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 74 L |