2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2013 Toyota Avalon
To start off, 2013 Toyota Avalon is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Avalon (264 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Avalon should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 312 kg more than 2013 Toyota Avalon.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Toyota Avalon. (336 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Toyota Avalon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota 4Runner | 2013 Toyota Avalon | |
| Make | Toyota | Toyota |
| Model | 4Runner | Avalon |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3950 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 264 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 382 Nm | 336 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 1608 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1835 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2820 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 64 L |
