2004 Toyota 4Runner vs. 2013 Volvo X670
To start off, 2013 Volvo X670 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2013 Volvo X670. (237 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2013 Volvo X670. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 48 kg more than 2013 Volvo X670. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo X670. (320 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo X670.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota 4Runner | 2013 Volvo X670 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | 4Runner | X670 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3950 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 6 valves |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 237 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 382 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 1872 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4838 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1604 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2815 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
