2004 Toyota Camry vs. 2013 Mazda CX-05
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-05 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Camry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Camry would be higher. At 2,362 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Camry (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-05. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-05. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-05 weights approximately 611 kg more than 2004 Toyota Camry.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Camry (220 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-05. (203 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-05.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota Camry | 2013 Mazda CX-05 | |
| Make | Toyota | Mazda |
| Model | Camry | CX-05 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2362 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 13.0 : 1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 944 kg | 1555 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4555 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2165 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.1 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 58 L |
