2004 Toyota Camry vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Camry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Camry would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Camry weights approximately 369 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Camry (325 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (260 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota Camry | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
| Make | Toyota | Mini |
| Model | Camry | Roadster |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3734 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2467 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |
