2004 Toyota Celica vs. 1982 Zastava 2101

To start off, 2004 Toyota Celica is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Celica (140 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Celica weights approximately 144 kg more than 1982 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Celica (170 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 2101.

Compare all specifications: