2004 Toyota Corolla vs. 2012 Land Rover LR2

To start off, 2012 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover LR2 (230 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Corolla. (194 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Corolla. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Land Rover LR2 weights approximately 835 kg more than 2004 Toyota Corolla. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2012 Land Rover LR2 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Toyota Corolla. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Land Rover LR2 (317 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Corolla. (260 Nm). This means 2012 Land Rover LR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Corolla.

Compare all specifications: