2004 Toyota Land Cruiser vs. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 5,935 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 815 kg more than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage.
Because 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage (469 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser. (434 Nm). This means 2013 Aston Martin Vantage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Toyota Land Cruiser | 2013 Aston Martin Vantage | |
Make | Toyota | Aston Martin |
Model | Land Cruiser | Vantage |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4671 cc | 5935 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 7300 RPM |
Torque | 434 Nm | 469 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 91 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2445 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4382 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 16.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 96 L | 80 L |