2004 Toyota Mark II vs. 2013 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-Z is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Mark II (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2013 Honda CR-Z. (120 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 2013 Honda CR-Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 373 kg more than 2013 Honda CR-Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Toyota Mark II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Honda CR-Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Mark II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Mark II (200 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda CR-Z. (174 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda CR-Z.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Toyota Mark II | 2013 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Toyota | Honda |
Model | Mark II | CR-Z |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.4 : 1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1247 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2435 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 40 L |