2004 Toyota MR2 vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota MR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota MR2 would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota MR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota MR2 (142 HP) has 33 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2004 Toyota MR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Toyota MR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota MR2 | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Toyota | Ford |
| Model | MR2 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2490 mm |
