2004 Toyota Sequoia vs. 1952 Triumph TR2
To start off, 2004 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph TR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph TR2 would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1952 Triumph TR2. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph TR2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1448 kg more than 1952 Triumph TR2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (427 Nm) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph TR2. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph TR2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Toyota Sequoia | 1952 Triumph TR2 | |
Make | Toyota | Triumph |
Model | Sequoia | TR2 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4671 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2313 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2250 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 99 L | 56 L |