2004 Toyota Sequoia vs. 2006 Volvo C70
To start off, 2006 Volvo C70 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Sequoia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Sequoia would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (240 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2006 Volvo C70. (138 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 602 kg more than 2006 Volvo C70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (427 Nm) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volvo C70. (220 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Toyota Sequoia | 2006 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Sequoia | C70 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4671 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2300 kg | 1698 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 99 L | 62 L |