2004 Toyota Sequoia vs. 2010 Ford F-150
To start off, 2010 Ford F-150 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Sequoia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Sequoia would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-150 (292 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. (240 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-150 weights approximately 52 kg more than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-150 (433 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. (427 Nm). This means 2010 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Sequoia.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota Sequoia | 2010 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | Toyota | Ford |
| Model | Sequoia | F-150 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4671 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 292 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 433 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2300 kg | 2352 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 5885 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2004 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1887 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3670 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 99 L | 98 L |
