2004 Toyota Sequoia vs. 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Sequoia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Sequoia would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 824 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1033 kg more than 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,060 Nm) has 633 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. (427 Nm). This means 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Sequoia.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota Sequoia | 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
| Make | Toyota | Koenigsegg |
| Model | Sequoia | CCXR |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4671 cc | 4719 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 1064 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 1060 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2313 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 13.1 L/100km | 18 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 22 L/100km |
