2004 Toyota Sequoia vs. 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
To start off, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Sequoia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Sequoia would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (370 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 176 kg more than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (508 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Sequoia. (427 Nm). This means 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Sequoia.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Toyota Sequoia | 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
Make | Toyota | Land Rover |
Model | Sequoia | Range Rover Sport |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4671 cc | 2013 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 370 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 508 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 11.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2313 kg | 2489 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4783 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2158 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1784 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2745 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 16.9 L/100km |