2004 Toyota Tundra vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 946 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Zastava 102. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota Tundra | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Toyota | Zastava |
| Model | Tundra | 102 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 3400 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2160 mm |
