2004 Toyota Tundra vs. 1992 Buick Century
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Buick Century. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Buick Century would be higher. At 3,375 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (183 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1992 Buick Century. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1992 Buick Century.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Buick Century. (183 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Buick Century.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Toyota Tundra | 1992 Buick Century | |
Make | Toyota | Buick |
Model | Tundra | Century |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3375 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 183 HP | 109 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 183 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4849 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1374 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2664 mm |