2004 Toyota Tundra vs. 1997 Acura TL
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (190 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1997 Acura TL. (176 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura TL.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota Tundra | 1997 Acura TL | |
| Make | Toyota | Acura |
| Model | Tundra | TL |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3376 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 176 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1405 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2840 mm |
