2004 Toyota Tundra vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (190 HP) has 96 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Toyota Tundra | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | Tundra | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3376 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 94 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2490 mm |