2004 Toyota Tundra vs. 2010 BMW X3
To start off, 2010 BMW X3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW X3 (260 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Tundra. (188 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Tundra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 196 kg more than 2010 BMW X3.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW X3 (305 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Tundra. (298 Nm). This means 2010 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Toyota Tundra | 2010 BMW X3 | |
Make | Toyota | BMW |
Model | Tundra | X3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3376 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 188 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 305 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2016 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4569 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1854 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1676 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2797 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 67 L |