2004 Toyota Tundra vs. 2011 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2011 Nissan Leaf is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Tundra would be higher.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Leaf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota Tundra | 2011 Nissan Leaf | |
| Make | Toyota | Nissan |
| Model | Tundra | Leaf |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4445 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 2.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 2.2 L/100km |
