2004 Toyota Tundra vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 147 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Tundra. (188 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Tundra.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi RS3 (450 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Tundra. (298 Nm). This means 2012 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota Tundra | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
| Make | Toyota | Audi |
| Model | Tundra | RS3 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3376 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 188 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
