2004 Toyota Tundra vs. 2012 Kia Venga
To start off, 2012 Kia Venga is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (190 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2012 Kia Venga. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2012 Kia Venga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 527 kg more than 2012 Kia Venga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Kia Venga, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Kia Venga. (137 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Kia Venga.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota Tundra | 2012 Kia Venga | |
| Make | Toyota | Kia |
| Model | Tundra | Venga |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3376 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1780 kg | 1253 kg |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 48 L |
