2004 Toyota Tundra vs. 2012 Opel Combo
To start off, 2012 Opel Combo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (190 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2012 Opel Combo. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2012 Opel Combo.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Opel Combo. (126 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Toyota Tundra | 2012 Opel Combo | |
Make | Toyota | Opel |
Model | Tundra | Combo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3376 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 126 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 73.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 80.6 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 52 L |