2004 Vector M12 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2004 Vector M12 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 5,707 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Vector M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Vector M12 (484 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 435 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Vector M12 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Vector M12 weights approximately 860 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Vector M12 (576 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 481 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Vector M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Vector M12 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Vector | Zastava |
| Model | M12 | 102 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 5707 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 484 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 576 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2160 mm |
