2004 Vector M12 vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Vector M12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Vector M12 would be higher. At 5,707 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Vector M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Vector M12 (484 HP) has 417 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Vector M12 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2004 Vector M12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Vector M12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Vector M12 | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Vector | Ford |
| Model | M12 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5707 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 484 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2490 mm |
