2004 Volkswagen Caddy vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volkswagen Caddy. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volkswagen Caddy would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 79 more horse power than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy. (126 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Volkswagen Caddy | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Holden |
| Model | Caddy | Epica |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.2 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
