2004 Volkswagen Caddy vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volkswagen Caddy. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volkswagen Caddy would be higher. At 1,398 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo (99 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo (130 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy. (126 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Aveo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volkswagen Caddy.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Volkswagen Caddy | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Chevrolet |
| Model | Caddy | Aveo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 99 HP |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2525 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 46 L |
